IMMIGRATION LAWYER - VISA SPECIALIST

---

Character/health issues and complex cases

Temporary Skill Shortage (TSS) - 482

Skilled Employer Sponsored Regional Visa - 494

Employer Nomination Scheme - 186 Transition/Direct Entry

Labour Agreement/DAMA ("Designated Area Migration Agreement")

Partner visa - 309/100 & 820/801

Fiance/Prospective Marriage - 300 subclass

General Skilled Migration - 189/190/491 subclass

Judicial Review/Administrative Review Tribunal 

Child

Citizenship

Global Talent Scheme

Business/Investor visa

Parent visas

Review and Cancellation

Visitor

Case 1: 

We have a client who had been with us since 2011, when he was one of our first clients. Our Principal Lawyer was able to help 3 of his brothers from Pakistan to come to Australia on 457  working visa.

Last month, the last of his brothers had been finally granted the permanent visa. He said to us that he will never go to another immigration lawyer/agent. 

Case 2:

We had a client who we helped to apply for the 457 visa, then the permanent visa 186. She was finally sworn in as an Australian Citizen with her husband, and her daughter in May 2018. She lodged the Citizenship Application upon our advices when the community was still shocked by the proposed changes to the legislation. By taking our advices, she is already an Australian Citizen sooner than others. 

Case 3:

A client came to our firm in December 2017 as the Department of Immigration had issued Monitoring Survey to 132 visa holder. We sought for an extension do provide further documents, but Department only gave us 7 days. We had to discuss, consult with the client to gather sufficient evidence to respond to the survey satisfactorily. The client was also not supported by the NSW Government. All documents were submitted in time before the Christmas break. 

The Department after 5 months had finally issued a letter stating that they were satisfied that the client had been making a genuine effort to operate the business. Without understanding the law thoroughly, we would have not been able to devise the correct strategy to achieve the favourable outcome for the client. 

If we did not provide satisfactory evidence, the client's 132 permanent visa could be cancelled.